Mě by docela zajímalo, proč se pouštíte do diskuse, když ani nejste ochotni otevřít google a svá tvrzení si ověřit. Já si svou definicí naprosto jistý nebyl, proto jsem to (předtím) udělal.
Google -> "value or growth stocks" -> první odkaz "investopedia.com"
LINK -
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/p ... h-best.asp
Závěr - "Although the above paragraph suggests that growth stocks would post the best numbers over longer periods, the opposite has actually been true." (celý si můžete přečíst na webu)
LINK -
https://www.fidelity.com/learning-cente ... -investing
"The term
value suggests that the investor is buying stock that is
relatively less expensive, as opposed to stock that is relatively more expensive. The stock of a company that is classified as a “value stock”
typically has a lower price-to-earnings ratio, which simply means that the stock currently has a lower price per share relative to the company’s earnings per share. "
"
Growth stocks are just the opposite.
They have higher price-to-earnings ratios; thus, an investor who purchases a growth stock is paying a higher price per share because he or she believes the stock price might go even higher."
"The 26-year annualized return of
growth-oriented large-cap U.S. stock was
8.60 percent (which represents the average of the Russell 1000 Growth Index and the Lipper US Index of Large Growth funds)"
"The two
value-oriented large-cap U.S. stock measures in this study (Russell 1000 Value Index and the Lipper US Index of Large Value funds) had an average return of
9.03 percent over the period 1990–2015"
Nějakou oficiální definici obou termínů vám nikdo nejspíš nenabídne, ale po 5 minutách na googlu musí být každému jasné, že growth stock není jenom Amazon či Netflix.
Pokud s definicí Fidelity nesouhlasíte, napište jim, že už to nějakou tu dekádu dělaj blbě a nejsou schopni ani zadefinovat kategorie akcií. A nebo .. (abych použil mnamova slova) si o tom nejdřív něco nastudujte
Radši se v tom už nepatlejme.
